Biafra: UN silence on Genocide in Nigeria Makes it an Accomplice in Genocide
Published on Wednesday, August 04, 2021 @ 12:23 CET by BIAFRA TODAY
 |
| Deputy UN Secretary General |
After the 2nd world war in 1945, 50 countries came
together to form the United Nations (UN). The purpose was to prevent further
human catastrophes caused by wars and to maintain international peace, security,
and human rights among member nations.
Subsequently, on December 9, 1948, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime
of Genocide (Genocide Convention) was codified as an instrument of International
law. It was the first human rights treaty ratified by the General Assembly to
proclaim the UN’s ‘commitment’ to ‘never again’ [allow a repeat of the
atrocities committed during the Second World War].
Article 2 of the Genocide Convention defines genocide as
"acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national,
ethnic, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group;
causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately
imposing living conditions that seek to "bring about its physical
destruction in whole or in part…”
The American Heritage Dictionary puts it succinctly as “the
systematic and widespread extermination or attempted extermination of a
national, racial, religious, or ethnic group.”
Article 1 of the Convention establishes that genocide is a
crime under international law and jurisdiction whether committed during peace
or wartime.
Accordingly, state parties to the Convention are mandated to:
1.
Enact laws to prevent and punish the crime of genocide irrespective of
the position of the perpetrators, “whether they are constitutionally
responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals” – Article IV.
2.
Enact the necessary
legislation to give effect to the provisions of the Convention – Article V.
3.
Prosecute persons
charged with genocide in a competent tribunal of the State in the territory of
which the act was committed, or by an international penal tribunal with
accepted jurisdiction (such as ICC) – Article VI.
These Articles conform to international norms and binding on
all countries even if they’re not parties or signatories to the Genocide
Convention.
But, since the convention, no less than 89 genocidal wars have
been recorded mostly in the former and current British and French colonies, in
Africa, South America, Asia, and the Middle east.
Africa alone has had more than 19 genocides including British
Nigeria, French Cameroon, South Sudan, Uganda, Darfur-Sudan, Burundi, DRC,
Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Rwanda all of which the UN either stands by, distorts
realities on the ground, elevates petty imperial interests above human lives,
takes sides, supports the genocidal governments, hides under ‘state
sovereignty,’ or is deliberately negligent for lack of interest.
And if they acted, it is usually belated, poorly executed,
unprofessional, and becomes part of the problem according to numerous reports
and journals from reputable sources.
For example, the UN waited despite several reports that
genocide was well underway in Rwanda in 1994 until no less than 800,000
Rwandans had been slaughtered. And when the peacekeeping force finally moved
in, they were instructed not to use force to break the violence. Every report
including ones conducted by the UN concluded that the United Nations failed
Rwanda, yet nothing has changed.
Again, the UN peacekeeping operations were similarly accused
in the Somalian genocide for being “negligent, unorganized, unprofessional, and
pre-occupied for the wrong reasons.” Read more here: The United Nations Peacekeeping Mission in Somalia | Grimes
Law PLLC (grimeslawaz.com)
In the case of Nigeria between 1966-1970, the UN was not only
negligent, but Britain, the architect, and
benefactor of the Biafra genocide weaponized her Security Council (SC) seat in
conjunction with her broadcasting power (BBC) to enforce a media blackout and disinformation
campaign against the victims, as well as muffle the fading cry of emaciated
children, millions of whom were starved and bombed indiscriminately by British
Nigerian soldiers acting under the directions of the British Army Command Center
in London, England.
Consequently, 3.5 to 5 million Biafrans and still counting
were killed for the sake of “one Nigeria.” No investigation into war crimes and
crimes against humanity has been conducted by UN to date.
Generally, African countries are less equipped militarily
than the superpowers. Therefore, any conflict within the African context can fairly
easily be arrested and the parties invited to air their grievances if the UN
were truly for peace and justice. But, parties to conflicts are often prevented
from or denied access to neutral arbiters at the UN or ICC because the instigators
of these conflicts sit barefaced on the UN Security Council (UNSC).
While all the ingredients pointing to genocide are evident,
the UNSC is not fazed by the preliminary slaughtering of hundreds of thousands of
innocent Nigerians.
So, rather than prevent genocide as elucidated in the state’s
Obligation under Genocide Convention, the Fulani terrorist administration of
British Nigeria are violently entrenching and exacerbating pogroms with the
tacit approval of the UN.
When the bloodthirsty Fulani
herdsmen embark on their usual killing spree, the UN, Britain, BBC, CNN, and
their allies recklessly report such incidents as ‘Farmer-Herder clash’ in order
to confound the world and preempt the uproar that such barbarism elicits.
Similar mendacities are
reported when government forces massacre peaceful IPOB protesters and unarmed
civilians.
And to validate these
false impressions, the UN and her imperial cronies pretend that there’s not
enough evidence to act on, ignore the victims, and confine their investigations
(the lack thereof) to the statements and denials of the perpetrators.
Make no mistakes, the
British and Nigerian codeword for government attacks, Fulani herdsmen
terrorism, and extrajudicial killings is “a clash” to tarnish the victims.
The Deputy
Secretary-General (DSG) of UN Amina Mohammed whom we shall review shortly is an
avid advocate of Climate Change. Thus, it’s not surprising that a
semi-illiterate Buhari visited the White House in 2017 and was heard mindlessly
blaming the killing of Christians by Fulani on ‘climate change’ and Libyans.
To be clear, Fulani (of
course not all) are menacing criminals who encroach on people’s properties
deliberately to steal, destroy, rape, maim, and kill the owners.
It is incredibly disingenuous
to accept or propagate the notion that a landless nomadic cattle herder who criminally
trespasses, destroys the fruits of a farmer’s labor, and brutally kills the
farmer had a ‘farmer-herder clash’ with him or did it because of ‘Climate
Change.’
On a different occasion,
while visiting the terrorist president on November 9, 2020, the DSG Amina
Mohammed blamed the EndSARS protests for the decades of police killings and
brutality on COVID-19.
The DSG is heard repeatedly extolling the sadistic idea of
‘One Nigeria’ even as heartless, jihad
obsessed, Fulani killers are all over the territory, slaughtering,
burning churches, killing Christians, kidnapping school children, mass raping
underaged girls, destroying farms, burning down entire communities, and moving
in to replace those they slaughtered with zero consequence or protection from
the government.
Rather than hold British
Nigeria accountable to prevent the ongoing pogroms and genocidal attacks in
Nigeria, the UN organizes very quiet low-profile seminars on Nigeria where
Amina Mohamed is seen admonishing beleaguered British Nigerians like Buhari to
‘build’ the nation.
Recall when Fulani
herdsmen terrorists invaded Agatu for three consecutive days without the
intervention of the security forces in 2016, slaughtered 500 people, and set
ablaze their communities in ‘retaliation,’ they claimed, for the killing of
their cattle. Then, Governor Samuel Ortom of Benue State went to Abuja to seek
assistance to stop the violence from the president, to which Buhari told him to
“go back and learn to live at peace with your Fulani brothers.”
So, while Fulani terrorist herdsmen attack entire communities
claiming that someone stole or killed their cow, the Nigerian army and police
similarly invade claiming that a soldier or policeman was killed by someone in
the targeted communities such as the massacres at Odi, Zaki biam, Obigbo, Orlu,
Enugu, Aba, Benue, Shiite Muslims, etc.
Here's another of such: https://247ureports.com/2021/07/residents-flee-as-soldiers-storm-enugu-community-over-death-of-policemen/
The Terrorist President Buhari with Amina
Mohammed, then Minister of Environment at the UN Climate Change Summit in
Paris, 2015.
According to Wikipedia, Amina Muhammed is a British citizen,
and a Fulani Nigerian who was born in Liverpool, UK to a Fulani father and a
British mother in 1961. After her university education in 1989, she left
Britain for Nigeria. On November 11, 2015, Buhari appointed her the Minister
for Environment. One year later, she was catapulted to the position of UN-DSG
in February 2017. Her political affiliation is the ruling APC party of British-Nigeria.
“There was a meeting three days ago in Geneva about this
country and a lack of access and human rights…
“So, when you want to say nothing is happening, please define
what you mean by nothing…
To which her acolytes applauded as she fired on
“…Every right comes with an obligation, to tell the truth,
and the truth in many cases comes in different colors depending on who’s
telling it…
This is a dangerous paradigm because the truth does not
respect persons. The Buhari regime and Fulani herdsmen militia are indubitably bloodthirsty
predators who prey on innocent victims. Therefore, all those promoting the idea
of ‘farmer-herder clash,’ ‘armed conflicts’, and ‘climate change’ claptrap must
reevaluate their notion of truth, fairness, and justice and stop trying to
obfuscate the issue.
…Mohammed continues…
“…And I’m not saying that this government is a saint, it’s
very far from it, but there are things we can do to make it better, that’s the
challenge I’m throwing to you…
The next 2 sentences reveal a blatant conflict of interest.
“You don’t wanna build
this nation, I don’t know where else you wanna go…
“When I stand outside and I hear what you have
to say about this country that I know that I can die for as one, then I’m
really sad because you’re young…
“…you have a huge future ahead of you, and then you’re
condemning yourself before you started on that journey…
“At the end of the day, there’s only so much that UN can do
in a country, It’s a sovereign country…
“You can’t just walk into a country and do what you want to
do.”
Watch the video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqgkvMH4x2U&t=8s
Here, the UN pretends to
be bystanders, or powerless to confront a sovereign nation when it suits them. But
other times, they make up alternate facts and invade. They only can explain why
terrorism in British Nigeria and Africa at large is implicitly encouraged.
The Fulani herdsmen who
are visible and easily apprehensible are not arrested or investigated after savagely
butchering a community.
The Fulani DSG must know
fully well that the terrorist government of Buhari does not prosecute fellow
Fulani when they perpetrate heinous crimes against humanity in violation of
Article VI of the UN Genocide Convention.
Moreover, Mohammed’s
position as DSG under the present circumstance in British Nigeria is
outrageous. The conflict of interest here is flagrant. A British-Fulani Nigerian
and Buhari’s appointee ought not to be presiding over Fulani Islamic conquest
at the UN exactly when Fulani are rampaging, raping, kidnapping, ethnic
cleansing, and slaughtering indigenous peoples of British Nigeria.
Also, it is common
knowledge that Frederick Lugard, the British soldier of fortune who maliciously
amalgamated the Northern and Southern protectorates later bragged that, “the
North and South are like oil and water [that] can never mix.” 107 years later,
British Nigeria is marred by hatred, disunity, pogrom, war, tribalism, nepotism,
genocide, terrorism, and unhealthy rivalry as Lugard envisioned.
Thus, genocide and the
threat thereof will never go away until this coldblooded, fraudulent British
agglomeration of disparate peoples, mutually antagonistic nations, cultures,
religions, and languages are reversed.
For her Genocide Convention obligations
to prevent, and not commit genocide, the Fulani government of British-Nigeria
have arbitrarily reconstituted all security apparatuses of the country as
ethnocentric forces whose only theatre of war are non-Fulani citizens of
Nigeria, thereby demonstrating a high propensity towards genocide, and
functioning broadly as an ethnic terror group with little regards for British
Nigerian laws.
For her obligation to
punish genocide, the Fulani-led British- Nigeria Government aids, abets, and
rewards genocidal actors so long as it serves their goal to conquer all other
nationalities in the British dungeon of oppression called Nigeria.
Her Military,
paramilitary, and police ranks are attained not by defending the territorial
integrity of British-Nigeria, or by apprehending known terrorists, but by
invading protesters and indigenous peoples of Nigeria with intent to reduce all
non-Fulani nomads to a status lower than Fulani cattle, and to forcibly
appropriate indigenous lands for Fulani wanderers and their colonial
puppeteers.
For her Article V
obligation to enact the necessary legislation to give
effect to the provisions of the Convention, the
lopsided Fulani-controlled legislature have been bribed and bamboozled out of
its constitutional duties by admitting criminals, terrorists, crooked past
governors, and heavyweight swindlers who have criminal cases hanging over their
heads into the National Assembly, who in turn defend terrorists or lack the
confidence to impeach the extremely lawless, traitorous, wicked, and terrorist president
of British Nigeria.
Since British Nigeria
has no good reason for the widespread killings, they have no need yet to
declare war because they’re able to get away with so much more than they could,
should the entire population and the world at large know that Fulani is already
at war with them.
More people are dying in
Nigeria than in countries at full-blown wars.
By very conservative
measures, hundreds of thousands of Nigerians have been quietly killed without
the declaration of war, while tens of millions have been displaced as agents of
the UN hold casual symposia on British Nigeria.
What other country has
refugees in neighboring countries, and Internally Displaced Persons camps in
‘peace’ time, and then uses her air force to massacre 236+ tormented and
downtrodden refugees as was done in Rann, Bornu IDP camp in January 2017?
Unfortunately, the arch-benefactors
of these mayhems and injustices are the permanent members of the Security
Council.
To its credit however, there were many times that the UN
acted swiftly and with overwhelming force.
For example, in 2003, Some
permanent members of the SC launched ‘Operation Shock and Awe’ to invade Iraq on
the basis of what later became a fictitious ‘mobile nuclear plant’. The
execution of Saddam Hussein further amplified sectarian conflicts plunging the
country into a civil war with the imperial powers choosing the winners,
spawning the ISIS terrorist organization, and causing the death of 2.4 million
people according to reliable reports.
Again, in 2011, the SC
sprang into action on the pretext of protecting Libyans by first embarking on
artful propaganda to demonize Gaddafi before invading. Like Iraq, Libya was
plunged into a civil war. In the aftermath, more than 250,000 Libyans have been
killed and the country remains war-torn and a humanitarian nightmare to date.
The Libya debacle
occurred against the backdrop of the 2009 UN General Assembly speech where Gaddafi
called the Security Council a “Terror Council” due to the 65 wars it either
masterminded, failed to stop, approved, or largely participated in. “We are about to put the United Nations on
trial; the old organization will be finished and a new one will emerge.” But
that’s not all…
Gaddafi demanded an investigation into past wars involving UN,
NATO, USA, Britain, France who are permanent members of the SC and to prosecute
those found guilty of causing these wars, misery, and the slaughtering of
millions “that has surpassed that brought by the Nazis.”
Plus, Gaddafi had revealed his plans for an African future
that was free from ruthless exploitation by the SC. His doom was thereby
sealed.
While Gaddafi may not be a saint, as at 2011 before the UNSC
and NATO destroyed Libya, it had the highest standard of living in Africa; it
was ranked 53rd in the 2010 UN Quality of Life Index “ahead of 9
European countries including Russia”; had free quality education up to Ph.D.
level; free state-of-the-art health care; 3rd lowest petrol price in
the world; citizens owned their own homes; Libya was debt-free, and the
government was indeed working for Libyans unlike Nigeria where public officials
are “fantastically corrupt,” embezzlers, money launders, murderers, terror
financiers; and where the government recruits, arms, and supports Fulani terrorists to assist the security
forces to slaughter hapless Nigerians on a daily basis.
What did Ghaddafi do to Libyans to justify his destruction
that Buhari has not done a thousand times over but yet remains undisturbed? Rather
than hold the terrorist president accountable, the UNSC give him more weapons.
For her Article VI Obligation
to try persons charged with genocide, the British Nigerian security forces under
the control of Fulani actors are hatefully attacking those that are forced to
defend their communities against the Fulani terrorists.
When will the UN hold
British Nigeria accountable for egregious violations of Articles iv, v, and vi and
all of the Genocide Convention obligations as well as the gamut of human rights
abuses and crimes against humanity?
For the UN apparently,
keeping the diametrically opposed nations of British Nigeria together to
enlarge the killing fields for Fulani and make way for the British Crown’s sadistic
and narcissistic ‘interests’ is more important than the lives and wellbeing of
those that dwell in it.
The UNSC wants Nigeria
to remain one despite the overwhelming evidence of insoluble antagonisms,
genocide, and unsustainability of the union.
The British and UN unprecedented position that if Nigeria
breaks up, it will “destabilize” the continent is baseless because there’s no
record of new nations shaking down the continents or countries they emerged
from including, but not limited to Brexit, Russia, Eritrea, South Sudan,
Slovakia, Czech Republic, Bosnia, Kosovo, Namibia, and the Falkland Islands
whom the British conducted a referendum to decide where only 3,000 locals
wished to belong in 2013.
As you can see, the British loves referendum when it suits
them, but sends dark-skinned imperial terrorists to nip it when it doesn’t.
Furthermore, with a terribly conflicted Fulani
DSG at the UN, Nigerian-Fulani crimes have no chance of receiving appropriate
exposure or surviving any serious inquiry. Afterall, the UN has been uncharacteristically
silent on the daily slaughtering of indigenous Nigerians for the past six years!
Her silence since 1967 on
the worst genocide in Africa remains instructive to date.
So long as the imperial oil cartels have free access to
pillage the oil and gas fields of Biafra treacherously left open by Fulani, their
policy will always be to keep Nigeria one and to empower Fulani by all means including
jihad and genocide.
State Parties whose foreign policy and economic interests
lead to genocide then, ought not to sit at the UNSC. Their inhumane economic
interests and foreign policies exacerbate genocide and make it impossible to
hold those committing crimes against humanity accountable.
The UN Secretary-General,
DSG, and SC are ostensibly negligent and complicit in Nigeria's crimes against
humanity by their conspicuous silence instead of alarm.
In conclusion, the UNSC is the resurgence and expansion of
the 1884 Berlin Conference with the oppressed colonies as footnotes to validate
their insanely homicidal and plundering impulses.
The ominous silence and indifference to Black lives in Africa
in the era of Islamic terrorism proves that African countries are mere extras
in the charter of the UN.
Neither
Britain nor France, due to their extensive imperial policy of thievery and
genocide in Africa, should be presiding over the conflicts they instigated with
their divide-conquer schemes, and barbarous “economic interests.”
Finally, the UN has failed to fulfill its
charter. The ‘Never Again’ commitment aberrantly excludes Africa. The
indigenous peoples of British Nigeria must understand that the UN pays no mind
to their suffering and dying at the hands of Britain and Fulani. The UN should
be protested and potentially boycotted until it is reformed because the status
quo only ensures one thing: Subjugation, Plunder, and Genocide.
Post A Comment:
0 comments:
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.